Condon Committee
Following sustained congressional pressure for an independent civilian review of the U.S. Air Force's Project Blue Book, the USAF in October 1966 contracted with the University of Colorado to conduct a 27-month scientific study of UFO reports. The committee — formally the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, colloquially the Condon Committee — was directed by Dr. Edward U. Condon, former president of the American Physical Society and director of the National Bureau of Standards. The final report, delivered 8 January 1969, ran to 1,485 pages; its summary "Conclusions and Recommendations" concluded that "further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby". The USAF used the report as the formal basis for closing Project Blue Book on 17 December 1969. The complete Condon files — including ~600 case studies and internal correspondence — are held at the American Philosophical Society Library (Condon papers) and at NARA in Record Group 341.
What the report actually concluded (verbatim)
"Our general conclusion is that nothing has come from the study of UFOs in the past 21 years that has added to scientific knowledge. Careful consideration of the record as it is available to us leads us to conclude that further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby."
— Edward U. Condon, Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, summary section, 8 January 1969. However, of the 91 case studies the committee actually completed, the report itself classified 30 cases as 'unidentified' — including the Socorro 1964 event.
The Low Memo and the credibility dispute
In April 1968, civilian-investigator Donald Keyhoe obtained an internal University of Colorado memorandum written 9 August 1966 by Condon's executive secretary Robert J. Low. The Low Memo — later known as the "trick" memo — described the project to colleagues as: "The trick would be, I think, to describe the project so that, to the public, it would appear a totally objective study but, to the scientific community, would present the image of a group of nonbelievers trying their best to be objective…" Publication of the Low Memo in LOOK magazine in May 1968 produced an internal credibility crisis: senior committee scientists Dr. David Saunders and Dr. Norman Levine were dismissed after dissenting; the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) sub-committee later concluded that the report's conclusions were "in direct contradiction" to its own case data.
Why the case remains pivotal
The Condon Committee is the single document with the greatest institutional effect on U.S. government UAP policy. Three downstream consequences flow from it. (1) Project Blue Book closed within 11 months of the report's publication; the U.S. military did not formally maintain a public UFO investigation programme between December 1969 and the 2020 establishment of the UAPTF (which later became AARO). (2) Federal funding for civilian academic UFO research effectively dried up after 1969; no major U.S. university obtained federal UAP research funding again until NASA's 2022 Independent Study Team. (3) The 30 cases that the Condon Report itself classified as 'unidentified' — including Socorro — remain in NARA RG 341 as the only U.S. government cases formally classified as scientifically unexplained from the pre-AARO era.
The voice on the tape
Timeline
Robert Low writes the 'trick' memo at U-Colorado. Not yet public.
USAF Office of Scientific Research contracts U-Colorado for the study. Condon named director.
~600 case files reviewed; ~91 fully studied. Field investigations to Tremonton, Hartford, Lake Erie.
Low Memo obtained by Donald Keyhoe; published in LOOK magazine May 1968.
Saunders + Levine dismissed from the committee for dissent.
Final report delivered: 1485 pages, 91 case studies, 30 'unidentified'.
USAF Secretary Robert Seamans formally closes Project Blue Book, citing Condon.
AIAA UAP sub-committee publishes a formal dissent: Condon conclusions inconsistent with own case data.
Condon papers donated to American Philosophical Society Library (Philadelphia).
GAO records-search reaffirms NARA holdings of underlying Blue Book files in RG 341.
NASA UAP Independent Study Team becomes the first federally-funded UAP academic study since Condon.
Linked evidence in this archive
-
Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (Condon, 1969)
1485-page final report. Bantam Books trade edition + USAF original. Includes 91 case studies, 30 classified 'unidentified'.
-
Robert J. Low — 'trick' memorandum, 9 August 1966
Internal U-Colorado memo describing the project's intended public framing as objective vs. private framing as 'nonbelievers'. Triggered the 1968 credibility crisis.
-
AIAA UAP sub-committee critique of Condon Report, 1972
Three-part AIAA paper concluding the Condon conclusions were in 'direct contradiction' to the committee's own case data.
Why this case still matters
The Condon Committee is the institutional pivot point in U.S. UAP history. Its public conclusion closed Project Blue Book, ended federal academic funding for UAP research for ~50 years, and established the policy posture that AARO's 2024 framework now formally inherits and modifies. Reading Condon — and especially the 30 unidentified cases buried in its case studies — is the prerequisite for understanding why the AARO mandate at 10 U.S.C. § 1683 had to be written so explicitly.
← Back to archive